Client intake
Collect agreed information through structured forms and route it for staff review.
Client portals & web applications
Give clients a clear next step and staff a shared view of the work. Start with the tasks that need a browser-based home, not a long list of features nobody asked for.
1.Sign in
2.Complete the next step
3.See the current status
Collect agreed information through structured forms and route it for staff review.
Organize requests and uploads with appropriate permissions and retention rules.
Show an agreed status without exposing internal notes or other clients’ records.
Give authorized people a shared work queue and approval process.
We define authentication, user roles, account recovery, and the records each role can access. Client data, document retention, and administrative access need explicit decisions.
A portal should answer practical questions: what is still needed, whether an upload was received, and who reviews it next. Map the invitation, sign-in, submission, acknowledgment, and staff-review journey before adding more features. Staff may need an internal work queue; clients may need only their own requests and a limited status view. Those are different interfaces, even when they use the same records.
Decide which document types belong in the portal, how large uploads can be, how access is revoked, and how long information should be retained. Consider failed uploads, mistaken submissions, and account recovery as well as the happy path. Malware checks, audit history, exports, and special data-handling controls require explicit review and scope rather than assumptions about what every portal includes.
The scope identifies hosting, deployment, backup arrangements, restore checks, software updates, and who responds to application issues. Special compliance requirements are reviewed separately; a portal alone is not a compliance guarantee.
Have a different question?
Talk it through with us
A browser-based portal generally does not require a separate app. Device support and browser requirements are agreed during discovery; offline use is not assumed.
We evaluate supported APIs, licensing, and the specific records you need before including a connection. Client-facing information may need a narrower permission model than the source accounting system.
No. Public-facing statuses should be agreed separately from staff notes, internal approvals, and operational details. The interface should show the next useful action without exposing unrelated records.
The proposal identifies hosting ownership, maintenance responsibilities, backup arrangements, and the support period. Ongoing care can be a separate agreement; it is not silently included forever.
Describe the workflow, report, or system you wish worked better. We’ll tell you whether it makes sense to automate, integrate, or build.